Sunday, 12 December 2010
Thursday, 25 November 2010
The Ashes began last night and cricket fans everywhere are excited. Resident Aliens out in the USA and elsewhere have a harder time in viewing / listening than those in England or Australia, so I'll share some thoughts just in case they are of use.
The easiest solution to the viewing problem is Willow TV. After our failure to get satellite TV installed at our place with all the trees surrounding us, back in 2006, I was delighted to discover that there is an internet service that is pretty good and constantly getting better. I pay about $150 a year to get Willow TV's coverage online and that gives you pretty much everything -- home and away test series, one-dayers and everything. The quality is not at all bad and constantly getting better. As of this series, they have begun a 1Mbps HQ stream and I had it on for a couple of hours last night without interruption.
There is usually a choice of streams on Willow, so that at the moment you can either get the Aussie coverage (which includes Richie Benaud and Mark Nicholas) or the Sky One coverage (with all the usual suspects). We have our TV set up for it and so we can plug the laptop into it and watch on-screen.
I like a bit of Test Match Special too, though, and this presents an additional challenge. For some reason, they block off access to TMS for international users. Actually, they forgot to do this on day one and I was hopeful that there was no block. But it is back in effect again tonight and will be for the rest of the series. Luckily, there is a solution -- Expat Shield. This is relative newcomer on the scene but I find it quite the best way to access the BBC iPlayer. It's advertisement-funded and you just download it for free and then switch it on when you want to get some UK-based material. As long as you can cope with the ads, it's a great solution, especially for listening to the radio -- it's close to an uninterrupted stream.
The other thing that adds to the expat's listening experience is the TMS Podcast, which is free for all and, of course, compulsory listening. In the build up to the Ashes, there was an excellent series of Times podcasts and I am hoping that there will be more to come. I was pleasantly surprised to see that The Times had made these podcasts available for free given their recent erection of a pay-wall for the much less desirable text content. The Guardian too had a great preview podcast and I am hoping that there will be more to come.
Saturday, 30 October 2010
A week or so ago, my friend Chip, of the excellent Two Minute Timelord Podcast, produced a special "BBC Week" in which he featured several guest presenters discussing the past, present and future of the BBC, celebrating the corporation and its flagship programme Doctor Who, while reflecting on the anxieties in the road ahead. The series begins with 2MTL 165: BBC's Under Pressure; How's Doctor Who? (Chip) and continues with 2MTL 166: Perryman's Prediction: The Future of Doctor Who at the BBC (Neil Perryman), 2MTL 168: Toby Hadoke Knows His BBC (by Simon Harries) and 2MTL 169: BBC Week Finale plus Shaun Lyon of Gallifrey One (Chip); and in the middle there, a guest spot from me: 2MTL 167: The BBC from Distant Shores, and That Big SJA Spoiler, which you can also catch here:
Saturday, 28 August 2010
Over on Anglotopia, Dana discusses the exciting possibility that a global version of BBC's iPlayer could be on the horizon (Talking Tellly: BBC head says global iPlayer is coming 'within a year'). Ever since the release of the iPlayer in 2007, I have been pressing for some kind of international version (Launch of the BBC iPlayer, but not for British expats). It has always struck me as something that would be very straightforward for the BBC to organize, and the advantage -- to them -- of the extra revenue stream would be substantial.
The technology is already there. Subscription based internet television has been with us for some time. The model used by a company like Willow TV (Watching the cricket in America) could be followed -- enthusiasts willing to pay simply go through a portal locked down by username and password. Why not offer international users the chance to pay the BBC Licence Fee and then to gain full access to the iPlayer?
As I see it, there are two blocks on getting this done at the moment. The first is the rights issue. Certain programmes could just not be shown outside the UK because of the terms that have been negotiated. This is especially true of sporting events, where rights are negotiated on a country-by-country basis. But this hardly needs to be a problem. There is already a model in place that can be followed here, and that model is the iPlayer itself -- the BBC Radio iPlayer. I can listen to some events on Five Live Sports Extra, like England home test matches, but I cannot listen to others, like foreign test matches. That's fine. I understand that, and I will use the means we have here to access coverage legitimately some other way. Likewise the football. Much of the British football coverage is locked out to me as an international user, but it is not a big problem because I can access the football through American TV channels like Fox Soccer Channel and ESPN.
The "rights" issue is a red herring. Any international user of a future iPlayer will understand that there are certain programmes that are blocked for rights issues, and we will put up with that in order to be able to access 90 per cent of the total content that is available.
The other issue is lack of imagination. Those discussing the issues are not immersed in the kind of expat culture that would enable them to see how these things could work. Only a short amount of time on the blogs, in the forums and so on would give the powers and authorities a feel for the kind of hunger that there would be for such a service.
The fact is that there are many people who love the BBC and who would pay for access. It's not just the British expats, like me, but Anglophiles of all kinds. And many of these people already effectively pay for access by means of VPNs and specialist services that find back-doors into the BBC iPlayer. And that money is not going to the BBC but to others.
So I welcome the news that the Global Version of the iPlayer could at last be on the way, and if any of the powers that be would like to chat about it with enthusiastic Anglophiles and British expats living in the US, we would be happy to obliged. And we wouldn't charge a consultation fee, either.
Friday, 11 June 2010
This is our second World Cup while living in the U.S.A. Last time, I talked about World Cup Coverage in the USA and things look quite similar this time. Here in the US, the coverage is not at all bad. ESPN and ABC are sharing the coverage, as before. You can catch every match, and everything is in HD. Quick, easy to see schedules available on the ESPN site. All good stuff.
One key difference is that this time, England kick off with a match against, of all nations, the U.S.A. So we had better batten down the hatches and take cover and just hope that we don't have the kind of embarrassment we managed in 1950, when we lost to the USA who at that point were still fielding amateurs. So on Saturday, at 2.30pm our time, it will be "Come on England!", which is the way that the British say what in American would be "Go England!".
But how do you get the authentic English flavour when you are watching the World Cup in America? It's not easy. Being a football fan here is a bit like being a Doctor Who fan here. It is well known enough for people to know what you are referring to, but not well known enough for anyone to have much in the way of actual conversation about the topic. True, you might be lucky enough to meet one of the chosen few who loves football (or Doctor Who), but that is a rare treat. It's a little bit like being a member of a cult. Those flying the England flag in England are flying it now because they are cheering on England in the World Cup. No question about it. Those who are flying the American flag here at the moment are flying it because, well, because they fly it anyway. The love flying the American flag here.
So to get a little taste of the English flavour of the World Cup in an attempt to feel at least a little connected, here is what we will be doing:
(1) BBC Radio FiveLive is the World Cup station. I am listening live as I write this post. I love the buzz. No substitute. I'll be listening live as much as possible.
(2) Baddiel and Skinner's podcast. I was delighted to discover this today. Baddiel and Skinner have made the World Cup in the past, and the European Championships, and their Fantasy Football was a real treat. Last time, they ran a series of podcasts for The Times which were essential listening. This time, they are sponsored by Absolute Radio. Already four are available. You can guarantee that it will be poignant, insightful and most importantly, absolutely hilarious.
(3) Five Live World Cup Daily. Clearly, FiveLive's podcast is also going to be essential listening.
(4) The Guardian World Cup Daily will certainly be worth catching. One preview episode so far.
Of course one of the curious differences about watching the World Cup over here is that all the timings are different. Those settling down to the England match on Saturday will just have finished watching the latest Doctor Who (The Lodger), which by remarkable planning or remarkable good luck features some football (and Matt Smith did, let us remember, actually play for my team Nottingham Forest back in the day). They will already have had a beer or two, and it will be getting dark outside. For us here, it will be early afternoon, with sun blazing and shining through the windows.
For American viewers, at least for those of us over on the east side, the three match times will be breakfast (7.30am), coffee time (10am) and siesta time (2.30pm). I must admit that I would prefer to be able to settle down in an evening to watch the odd match, but I like the variety. The breakfast time slot is going to remind me of the Korea / Japan World Cup of 2002 when we were eating our breakfast cereal out of special World Cup cereal bowls -- which we still have.
I suppose one of the big differences this time will be the first Twitter and Facebook World Cup. No one was on Twitter or Facebook back in 2006. It's going to be fun to have that added element this time. And it is going to make any attempt to try to DVR matches to watch later on pretty forlorn. So I am just going to have to try to catch as much as I can live.
Oh, and of course it will be important to be singing along to some rousing England songs over the coming weeks, with Three Lions the top of the list. I actually love the new (2010) version:
But of course we'll be listening to snatches of the original too.
I think I might be too excited to go to bed.
Come on England.
Friday, 28 May 2010
So how do you watch the Eurovision Song Contest in America? Well, you don't. Not on normal American telly channels, at least. Previous experience suggests that the only way to get it legally is to stream it live over the internet, by going to Eurovision.tv. In previous years, the quality has been pretty high for an internet stream. The main downside is a kind of eery silence where the commentary should be -- it is the direct, no-frills stream with no commentary, no phone-numbers to ring.
I have talked about this in the past over on The Americanization of Emily and so won't repeat myself here except to add that I am tempted this year to hold off a bit. Sitting indoors and watching Eurovision live, with no British commentary, at three in the afternoon, on the first day of summer, when our pool opens tomorrow, does not somehow feel like the fun it once did, all the more so as this year, for the first time since its return, Doctor Who is not going to be cancelled on BBC1 for Eurovision. Result!
Somewhat bizarrely, BBC America, on the other hand, which does not show Eurovision, is cancelling its showing of Doctor Who tomorrow night and instead showing repeats of previous episodes, so now creating a three-week time-lag compared to the two-week one they began with. Who is able to explain the mysteries of BBC America?
Thursday, 27 May 2010
But what about watching the Test Matches if you are in America? There are two legal ways to do this. One is to get satellite TV. Direct TV have cornered the market here, but I think you can get hold of cricket on Dish too. This is not an option for us after the trauma of trying to get satellite installed in order to watch the cricket four years ago, a story detailed on The Americanization of Emily.
The second legal option is the one that I go for: Willow TV. It's pretty good and it is getting better all the time. This year it is $150 for all international cricket for the entire year, test matches, one dayers, Twenty20, in all countries. This is far, far cheaper than the equivalent satellite price, either here or back in England. It streams at a reasonable quality, similar, say, to watching the BBC iPlayer live. If you have a good internet connection and router, it will stream without interruption. They have a choice of different feeds and the one I always go for is the feed that comes directly from Sky, which enables you to watch in wide screen when you plug the laptop into the TV, and which retains all the Sky adverts, which gives the Resident Alien a great taste of home.
One thing I like about Willow is that it is just username and password based, so you can watch on any computer you like, at home or at work (shh!), as long as you don't do anything daft like trying to watch it on two machines at once. The only disadvantage is that the live feed has a delay of about 15-20 seconds, so you can't really watch it with the sound down while listening to TMS, unless, of course, you would like to hear the commentary first so that you know to pay special attention to the pictures when something really exciting happens.
I should add that I am not on commission here, but mention it because a lot of people do not realize that Willow TV provides such a good solution for the cricket lover out here. I only discovered it by accident back in 2006.
Wednesday, 5 May 2010
Update (Friday, 10.47am): C-SPAN 3 coverage went right through to 10.45am, until BBC1 and BBC Election 2010 online coverage ended.
Update (Friday, 8am): C-SPAN will resume coverage at 8.30am on C-SPAN 3. In the mean time, watch live here:
Update (Thursday, 8.21pm): C-SPAN moved the coverage over to C-SPAN 1 at 8pm.
The worry is over, at least for those with a good cable package: C-SPAN have just confirmed that they will be broadcasting the BBC Election Night Special on C-SPAN 3:
The British election is tomorrow, May 6th, and our coverage will include a simulcast of the BBC Election Results starting at 4:55pm ET on C‑SPAN3, comprehensive analysis of the returns from key constituencies, and interviews with leading politicians.It's good to see that they are beginning coverage at 4.55pm ET, exactly as the BBC coverage begins. I realize that some will be disappointed because they don't have access to C-SPAN 3 on their cable packages, though my guess would be that most people who have BBC America will also have C-SPAN 3, and that should be most of the British expats and Anglophiles over here. I must admit to being delighted that I will be able to watch the BBC Election coverage live on TV, really delighted.
Update (16.43): Jonathan has now blogged on this too, over at Anglotopia.net, Where to watch the British Election results in the USA on May 6, where he also provides a link to the live election news feed available on the BBC News Channel, which is not locked down to international users, BBC Election 2010, which may be a good source for those who do not have C-SPAN 3 on their cable packages.
There is no official confirmation yet that C-SPAN will be broadcasting BBC's Election Night tomorrow, but the signs are good. C-SPAN will release their schedules for tomorrow this evening. In the mean time, they have added a feature on the British Party Election Broadcasts. The first of them, the Labour Party one, is of interest to Doctor Who fans because it features Sean Pertwee, son of the third doctor, Jon Pertwee, mentioned at the beginning of the broadcast. And the voiceover at the end is from tenth doctor, David Tennant.
Monday, 3 May 2010
In my previous post, Where to watch the UK election on Thursday?, I noted that the proper (BBC1) Election Night special would not be airing on BBC America and that the best bet was C-SPAN, who have broadcast all three of the leaders' debates live. With thanks to both David Hendrix and an anonymous commenter, there is some encouraging news in a Huffington Post article by Martin Lewis, UK Election: Conservatives Poised to give Britain a Good Flocking. The piece of interest is the following:
I just heard from a good pal at C-Span that C-Span will be presenting a feed of BBC TV's election night coverage. The reason this is not showing on the C-Span schedule pages yet is because they have not yet determined which of their three channels (C-Span 1, 2 or 3) will be used for the coverage. As soon as I hear more - I will post it here.Lewis speculates that the coverage will begin with the British coverage, 10pm (5pm ET) and go through the night. As I mentioned previously, C-SPAN only update their schedules a day in advance so it may be a little before we have confirmation, but it is very good news that we may be able to watch the proper BBC election night coverage.
Update (23.32): confirmed by japascot on Twitter.
Saturday, 1 May 2010
Well, the third of the leaders' debates is now over and there are only a few days left of campaigning before polling day on Thursday. I'm an election junkie and always look forward to election night. I'm a stay-up-all-night person and have been since 1987. (I stayed up a bit in 83, but I was doing my 'O' Levels, so couldn't pull an all-nighter.) This one is clearly going to be a cracker, the most interesting since 1997, perhaps the closest since 1992. One of the things that I am looking forward to this time is being five hours behind, which means that all the juicy stuff should start happening long before the middle of the night. So I've blanked out Thursday evening and night in my diary, I have got the beers in, and soon I will have everything ready for the toasted sandwiches, the traditional food of election night, at least in my house.
But there is a concern. Where will I be able to watch it? It is, of course, compulsory to watch Election Night on the BBC, with David Dimbleby and all. There is simply no competition, and Dimbers is the only choice. I had imagined that BBC America would be carrying the BBC1 coverage all the way through. For the American presidential election, they did take the BBC coverage. As of now, though, their schedule for Thursday just lists all the usual rubbish, Gordon Ramsay and the rest. I wrote to BBC America about this and received the following reply:
BBC America is committed to providing the most honest, objective and straightforward news coverage from around the world. We are pleased to let you know that on May 6th 2010, the date of the UK General Election, the channel will present a special edition of BBC World News America focusing on all of the twists and turns of the day’s events, from across the party spectrum.Unfortunately, this does not tell us anything much, unless the "special edition" of BBC World News America is in fact the live broadcast of the election coverage from the UK.
I have also asked C-SPAN if they are planning to carry some coverage direct from the UK since they have been the best of all the channels to this point in covering the election, e.g. they have broadcast all three of the leaders' debates live on C-SPAN 3. I have not yet heard back from them, and they only update their schedules about twenty-four hours in advance.
I hope it won't have to be a case of plugging the laptop into the telly and streaming over the internet.
More as soon as I have it.
Update (Saturday, 14.23): More from BBC America in response to my wallpost on Facebook:
On May 6 at 7pm et/pt there will be special election coverage on BBC America's program BBC World News America. As the count begins to come in Matt presents a special Election Day program from the BBC’s Television Centre in London with Katty Kay in Washington DC. There will also be online coverage, which we will post about when there are more details.I am afraid that this is bad news, for several reasons: (1) This confirms that BBC America are not showing the main BBC1 / BBC News feed from England. (2) They are not starting coverage until 7pm. Coverage should start at 5pm (10pm British time). (3) There is no indication how long the coverage will last for. The schedule has not changed on the BBC America site, so it looks like the "special election coverage" is not going to be lengthy, unless there are schedule changes to come.
So it looks like we may need to hope for C-SPAN, or go online.
Update (Sunday, 14.20): David Hendrix writes:
In past UK elections (certainly 2001 & 2005), C-Span HAS presented a live stream of BBC's election night coverage. Don't know why their website shows no listings yet for Thursday. As their UK debate coverage has been good I expect them to again carry the BBC feed.David is right about the iPlayer. It will only work over here if you've found a good VPN or some other means of accessing it. Nevertheless, I am wondering whether the BBC will stream their election coverage from the website, as they did for the third leaders' debate. But that might be hoping too much. It is good to hear about the Sky possibility, and also to hear about the C-SPAN coverage last time. They have really come up trumps on this campaign so far, the only channel to carry all three leaders' debates live over here. I have emailed them to find out if they are planning to carry the BBC coverage this time too. Well, we should know by Wednesday evening, at the latest, when they update their schedules.
It is no good trying to watch BBC coverage on the BBC website because the BBC iplayer detects if your IP address is outside the UK - and prevents US-based computers from getting the signal
However - the SKY TV website will probably be streaming their TV feed. If you can stand Adam Boulting's smirk...
Update (Monday, 22.28): More news: BBC Election Night to show on C-SPAN?
Thursday, 29 April 2010
In the aftermath of bigotgate, tonight's leaders' debate is looking all the more interesting. If you are wondering where to find the third and final leaders' debate on US TV, the good news is that once again C-SPAN have stepped up to the plate. Their 2010 British Election Debate page has this morning been updated to announce that the debate will be aired live on C-SPAN 3, also live on their website.
On the previous two occasions, ITV and Sky also made the debates available online live for international viewers. It is not clear at this point whether the BBC will retain the usual lock-out to international users, so online viewers will be best off following it either on the C-SPAN stream or on CNN (CNN UK Election blog). CNN are planning to stream the third debate -- see Live UK Debate Coverage on CNN. Those with CNN International will be able to catch it on that TV channel too.
For following along live on the net, I'd also recommend The Guardian's General Election Live blog. They have been right on top of all the developments, and it is packed with interesting comment.
The debate is all the more interesting to me since it is located at the University of Birmingham, my former employer, where I spent a happy decade. It's been nice to see the pictures and news coverage from there. The debate takes place in the Great Hall, where the graduation ceremonies take place every July.
Friday, 23 April 2010
- The mystery over why Amy does not remember the daleks. Fascinating. Please it was revisited again at the end of the episode.
- The doctor defeats the daleks with a jammie dodger. I love the way that you don't notice it's a jammie dodger until he tells you it is and eats it. "I was promised tea".
- The green war-time daleks were just great. They looked great, they were menacing and I love the dramatic irony of only the viewer sharing the doctor's knowledge of the daleks, while everyone else -- Amy, Churchill -- were ignorant.
- The dalek asking "Would you care for a cup of tea?" was great.
- Ian McNiece as a big fat Churchill was avuncular and all wrong.
- The new colourful iDaleks are going to take a lot to get used to. If you didn't like them, I strongly recommend the latest Tin Dog Podcast for an hilarious rant on the topic (e.g. he tells us the daleks' names, Tinky Winky, Dipsy, La la . . .).
- Again, the episode felt a bit rushed. Even another three or four minutes might have improved the pace.
Wednesday, 21 April 2010
I blogged earlier this week on the coverage in America of the Second Leaders' Debate and since then, I have been keeping an eye out for updates. As predicted, it seems that C-SPAN 3 will again be airing the debate live. It's recently appeared on their schedules online. So the place to go will be C-SPAN Live Stream if you are watching online or to search for C-SPAN 3 if you have a good cable TV package. For us, it's Channel 120. Unfortunately, it is not listed yet on the TV guide, which makes setting the DVR a little difficult because C-SPAN have two six hour programme wedges that span either side of the 90 minutes of the debate.
Meanwhile, japascot tweets that BBC America have said "On May 6th, the channel will present a special edition of BBC World News America". Well, I hope that that translates as taking the BBC1 coverage from 5pm through to the small hours. At the moment that does not appear on their schedules. I'll be keeping an eye out.
Update (Thursday, 7.40): now covered on C-SPAN's front page along with the news that they will also feature a live programme from Sky that covers the election so far.
Update (Thursday, 13.08): For those who have it, CNN International are also showing the debate live. I've checked our cable package, and it is not offered by Time Warner Cable in the Carolinas. But CNN is a good place to go for UK Election coverage. See their UK Election Blog and follow UKElectionCNN on Twitter. Also, Connect the World will be running a live blog and the whole debate is being streamed live on CNN.com.
Back in October 2007, we took a trip to Harlem, Georgia, the birth place of Oliver Hardy, for the 19th Annual Oliver Hardy festival (Travel Diary: Harlem, GA: Oliver Hardy Festival). One of the highlights of the trip was seeing the superb Laurel and Hardy impersonators, Jamie McKenna and Bill Leavy. Viola took two videos of them and uploaded them to Youtube (Laurel and Hardy Impersonators in Harlem) and in the intervening couple of years they have been a huge hit, with over 18,000 hits on the first and 10,000 on the second. hIt has been enjoyable seeing just how popular these short video clips have become. If you haven't seen them yet, or would like to see them again, ere they are:
I am amazed that these great impersonators have not made a greater impact on the net. As far as I can tell, our youtube uploads are the only substantial ones of them (see also brief clips here from a 2008 convention), and the comments there confirm how impressed others are with these two men.
Monday, 19 April 2010
Well, who would have thought that the first of the Leaders' Debates would have been such an event, and that it would have made such an impact on the campaign? With the big surge for the Lib Dems following on from Nick Clegg's performance in the debate last week, all the more attention is focused on the second of the debates this Thursday at 8pm (British Summer Time).
Last week, I was delighted to hear from C-SPAN here on the Resident Alien blog that they were to be broadcasting the first of the leaders' debates live. I followed the debate first online, via their live stream, and then when I got home on DVR from the C-SPAN 3 channel. If you missed it, it is still available on ITV's Youtube Channel, and it is not locked down for international users. But what of the second leaders' debate in the US?
There is no news yet from C-SPAN about whether they will be broadcasting it live, but we'll be keeping an eye out on their 2010 British Election page for updates and will report here as soon as there is any news. C-SPAN are promising to show the recorded version next Sunday at 9pm ET.
The broadcasters for this second debate are Sky News and it looks like it will be possible to access their coverage live on the net via Sky News online, though it is not certain yet whether they will lock it down to international users. Some details are available at Where to Watch the Sky News Leaders Debate, though this is aimed mainly at UK-based British users.
Saturday, 17 April 2010
A year or so ago I posted on the problems Doctor Who was having getting a proper home and proper treatment here in America (Doctor Who back in America -- at last). Well, all that has changed now, and its new home, BBC America, begins airing the new series tonight, "at 9/8 Central" as they say here, which means 9pm Eastern time, 8pm Central time. There are lots of things to like about the way BBC America are are treating the new series:
- It is only two weeks behind the UK. It is excellent to have the show on here so soon after its British outing. This kind of convergence has been happening increasingly with international programme, and in the opposite direction, US to UK, too.
- It's available in HD. Doctor Who only went into High Definition with the 2009 specials, and it is good news that it is being broadcast here in HD. I realize that not everyone yet has BBC America HD, but we are among the lucky ones here in Raleigh.
- There has been a massive and unprecedented media blitz. For the first time ever, the main stars (Matt Smith as the doctor, Karen Gillan as Amy Pond) and chief honchos (Steven Moffat, the head writer, and producers Beth Willis and Piers Wenger) have been in the US promoting the show before it airs (Doctor Who in New York; Doctor Who Mania hits New York).
- BBC America are airing a Doctor Who marathon today, with back to back episodes from 2008 and 2009 ahead of the premiere of the new series tonight at 9.
Friday, 16 April 2010
Before the credits are rolling, the dark background of this story is established. Timmy gets a zero at school, the already sinister "smiler" becomes even more sinister, and the child soon finds himself in some kind of abyss. Once again, the scares are there for child viewers of all ages, but they are also experienced directly by children in the story itself. If Doctor Who is a kids' show, Steven Moffat is constantly reminding us of the fact by featuring children in the show. The very reason for the doctor's intervention is the sound of the child crying.
"The Beast Below" was an excellent follow-up to the series opener last week. We are fascinated by the new doctor, and learning more about him all the time, and are sometimes surprised by what we see. His outburst at the end, reminiscent of several of the former doctors' crosser moments, was pretty shocking.
Meanwhile, Amy Pond is already one of the most compelling of the doctor's companions. That she spends the entire episode in her nighty is a masterstroke of that same fairy tale tone. For Moffat, it made her Wendy to the doctor's Peter Pan. For me, it was a reminder of those dreams when you realize you have gone out in your pyjamas. Amy is only gradually waking up to the remarkable turn in her life's story. This is Amy exploring starship UK, before she is covered in sick, at the hole in the road with "Magpie Electricals" clearly visible:
It's the night before her wedding and here is Amy, in her nighty, at the back of beyond, thousands of years in the future, with her childhood fantasy friend. And what's more, it turns out that she is good for him, and ends up saving the day.
It was never likely that the second episode in this new series would be as good as the first. It is not as funny, as clever or as exciting, but that would hardly have been possible after such a fantastic start, all the more so given the length of this one, back to the usual 42 minutes or so. In fact this one could have done with another 10-15 minutes to give us chance to observe everything carefully. I bet there were a few kids who lost the plot here a few times.
There were plenty of things to like, though. Liz 10 was fun, and just the kind of character we have seen over the last five years or so, and the utterly ridiculous idea of "Starship UK" floating in space on top of a space whale was as bonkers as anything in Russell T. Davies's era. And I, for one, like bonkers. And so it turns out that new show-runner Steven Moffat is in fact one of Russell T. Davies's biggest fans. "The Eleventh Hour" was not just a one-off. Although things are different -- new doctor, new companion, new TARDIS, new tone -- we are clearly watching the same show. In the best tradition of Doctor Who -- always the same, always different.
This one is round about a 4 for me, perhaps nudging up towards a 4.5, and so as I go down a bit and Loren comes up a bit (The Busybody: The Beast Below (AKA: The Last of the Starwhales), we might even meet in our ratings next time, in what looks like a superb episode, "Victory of the Daleks".
On the podcasting front, there has been a wealth of excellent podcasts on this episode over the last week, and most people are loving the series. Among others, I enjoyed the new Whocast (with Paul and Seb back), Podshock (including a remarkable review from Darth Sceptical who gave it zero!), Radio Free Scaro (all three of whom still love the new series and I am so used to the acerbic comments that it takes some getting used to), The Doctor Who Podcast (from the guys who used to do the Whocast - listen out for Tom's guffaws), and The Oodcast (always very funny). And, of course, my personal favourite, the Two Minute Timelord.
Thursday, 15 April 2010
I blogged yesterday on British Election Coverage in the USA: the leaders' debates and I am happy to add now an update from Jeremy at C-SPAN, who offered this comment in my post:
I wanted to let you know that the first of these British debates, between Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Conservative Leader David Cameron and Liberal Democrat Leader Nick Clegg, will be shown LIVE on C-SPAN3.I'd like to thank Jeremy for letting me know this good news, and I am delighted to hear that the first of the debates is going out live. Let's hope that the other two will go out live too. Since I am at work, I am setting the DVR at home for this one, and will be trying to catch some of the livestream while at work. Down our way, C-SPAN 3 is Channel 120. You can watch it live online here: C-SPAN Live Stream, or after the event here: C-SPAN 3. The event is also covered on the front of C-SPAN's homepage.
Here’s the link to our webpage on the 2010 British Elections, along with a link to our LIVE stream of C-SPAN3. Be sure to check the website in the coming weeks for information on further coverage of the debates.
Wednesday, 14 April 2010
I asked some questions last week about British General Election Coverage in America. After digging around a bit, I have a bit more now on the question of how expats will be able to access the first ever televised leaders' debates. As I predicted, C-SPAN are planning to air all three debates, but the bad news is that they are not airing them live, nor even on the same day. They have announced the following schedule:
Sunday April 18 on C-SPAN at 9 pm ET
Sunday April 25 on C-SPAN at 9 pm ET
Sunday May 2 on C-SPAN at 9 pm ET
So if you want to catch them live, it looks like it is going to be the internet or nothing. As it happens, I'll be at work and in meetings so I probably will only catch some of it online anyway. It's not yet completely clear to me whether international viewers will be able to watch the live stream of this one, but it looks like it is a possibility:
ITV: The First Election Debate, Thursday 15 April, 8.30pm
My guess is that the live stream will be available to international viewers, unlike content in the ITV Player. It is certainly the case that it will be available to international viewers after the event, via ITV1's Youtube Channel, since this is mentioned in their press release.
Meanwhile, on the podcasting front, the Guardian Election Daily Podcast and Radio 4's Vote Now Show are already daily essentials. What with all the Doctor Who podcasts to listen to at the moment, there are hardly enough travelling and houseworking hours in the day to keep up.
Update (Thursday): the first debate is to go out live on C-SPAN 3 -- details here.
Thursday, 8 April 2010
[Warning: contains some mild spoilers]
But let me give a little more context to my enjoyment of this piece. It's now five years since Doctor Who returned to BBC1, in 2005. There were four series in consecutive years, and then last year, we had just a series of "specials" ahead of the regeneration of the doctor and the series, with a new showrunner, Steven Moffat. The specials were pretty good but not outstanding, with the possible exception of last November's "Waters of Mars". They were fun and they gave us what we might have expected, but they never quite dazzled. We had the repetition of familiar themes, we had some so-so plotting, and it by the end it felt a little drawn out. In a way, the problem with 2009 was that it left us waiting too long for each episode and our expectations were raised too high. But there was something thrilling at the end of it all, a regeneration.
I've always loved regeneration episodes. One of my favourite Doctor Who moments from my youth was the regeneration in 1974 from doctor 3 (Jon Pertwee, my doctor) to doctor 4 (Tom Baker, everyone's doctor). And I never quite forgave Tom Baker for staying in the role for so long that I was losing interest by the time he regenerated into doctor 5 (Peter Davison, the out-of-breath doctor) in 1981. In the reboot of 2005, there was no regeneration from doctor 8 (Paul McGann, the one-hit-wonder doctor) to doctor 9 (Christopher Ecclestone, the "daft old face" doctor), and we had hardly had chance to get used to him before he regenerated into doctor 10 (David Tennant, the fangirl's doctor).
So when we finally had a regeneration, on New Year's Day, just before we flew back from England to America, it was kind of thrilling, but the thing that was most thrilling about it was seeing that first minute of doctor 11, Matt Smith. He was instantly superb. He cried aloud as his face appeared, replacing Tennant's, his energy and enthusiasm already bursting from every pore of his body. It was just one minute, but it was enough to suggest that he was going to be brilliant. And now, after his first episode aired on Saturday, we know just how brilliant he is and is going to be.
"The Eleventh Hour" is already one of my favourite episodes of Doctor Who. It's everything a good episode of Doctor Who should be and more, bonkers, brilliant, scary, fascinating, funny and unlike anything else on television. The pre-credit section provides a delightful link with the previous series, picking up the action with the TARDIS hurtling towards the earth, which in the land of recent Doctor Who means London and Big Ben. The new credits along with the revised theme-tune were perfect -- back to the time tunnel look of the Tom Baker era, along with music that evolves from the rewritten noughties theme tune, which managed to be both funky and orchestral, throwing in some electronics that nod nicely to the show's past and the great Delia Derbyshire.
New show-runner Steven Moffat penned this episode, and its opening scene proper, in the garden of Amy Pond's storybook style house, had all his trademarks, like the opening scenes of his Series 3 episode "Blink". And the episode's plotting typically borrowed motifs from Time Traveller's Wife, which is surely one of Moffat's strongest influences, seen in several of his stories, and especially Series 4's "Silence in the Library". In the latter, the doctor meets his possible future wife, River Song, in a library for the first time, when she knows him but he does not know her, just as in Time Traveller's Wife. In both, the woman is carrying a diary full of spoilers.
Now Moffat returns to an element in that book that he has already used once before, in Series 2's "Girl in the Fireplace". Here, the first influential meeting with the time traveller happens to a little girl who has a future with the stranger but who must wait to see him again. In the new twist on this familiar story, with the doctor meeting the young Amelia Pond, superbly played by Caitlin Blackwood, there is an added poignancy. The sadness of Amelia's long wait for the doctor to return feels all the worse straight after one of the funniest scenes ever seen in Doctor Who, as the doctor rejects one type of food after another in the kind of way that kids will find hilarious -- there is nothing funnier than adults behaving badly.
During those first ten minutes or so, Matt Smith simply owns the role. There is no period of having to get used to him. Like the young Amelia, we like him straight away. It's no wonder that Moffat apparently liked him instantly at his audition. The viewer is fascinated by him -- he is familiar but different. And so, when Amy is finally invited into the TARDIS at the end of the episode, it is our invitation too. And for the first time since Ian and Barbara stepped aboard in fear in 1963, the viewer joins the companion in gazing in wonder at what they see. Normally, we are in the know, and we are waiting with the doctor to see the companion express their amazement at seeing what we already know. This time, we are seeing the new TARDIS interior (and it really does look gorgeous) at the same moment that Amy sees it, with a wide-eyed thrill.
Those who were hoping for revolution rather than evolution would be disappointed. As many of us realized, the new show-runner, Steven Moffat, is in fact one of Russell T. Davies's biggest fans, and he works here with the RTD legacy, and you can see it all the way through, with reminders of episodes like "The Runaway Bride", "Smith and Jones" and "Christmas Invasion" as well as Moffat's own episodes like "Girl in the Fireplace". In fact several plot elements were strikingly reminiscent of RTD's stories, sending out viruses by mobile phone, saving the world from a laptop in a young man's bedroom, characters walking around like zombies. Anyone hoping that this is transitional stuff for the first episode in the new era will, I think, be disappointed again. The whole structure of the series looks RTD-influenced. The next episode, a future UK flying in space, is straight out of the RTD manual. This is exactly as it should be. Moffat really seems to know what he is doing.
In our enthusiasm for the on-screen presence of Matt Smith, Karen Gillan and young Caitlin Blackwood in this episode, it's easy to forget the fourth major star of this episode, Llandaff in South Wales, which stood in for Leadworth, Amy Pond's home village. Doctor Who is at its best when it is unashamed of its quintessential Britishness, and this location, with its village green, its post office, its duck pond, looked exquisite. Here it is in one of the clips that was shown a lot ahead of the broadcast (and doesn't Matt Smith do a brilliant Tennant impression here? Close your eyes and it's him):
I suppose a large part of this was that it reminded me of where I used to live, near Kings Norton in Birmingham, which had a green just like this. There are similar village greens all over the country and it's the perfect location for the first episode of a new series of Doctor Who. It makes the episode feel right -- it looks fresh and yet authentic at the same time.
"The Eleventh Hour" was the perfect episode of Doctor Who, a series that is always the same but always different. Matt Smith is the Doctor, recognizably the same man and yet completely different. The series is recognizably new Who, with lots of continuity with the Russell T. Davies era at the same time as homage to the classic series. The new TARDIS symbolizes that change, the homage, outside and inside, to the classic series, but located firmly in the new era. Kids of all ages will have loved this one. This was a remarkably strong debut. 5 TARDIS groans all the way.
With the General Election called this week for 6 May, I have begun to wonder what kind of coverage there will be for British expats in America. It's my first British election since moving to America so I have no direct experience. Of course we will continue to consume most of the election news via the internet, with the BBC Election 2010 and the Guardian Election 2010 websites the two places I will be visiting most often, all the more so this time with The Guardian promising a daily election podcast beginning next week.
But what about TV coverage here? Election day itself will almost certainly be covered live on BBC America, though they don't have anything on their schedules yet. Usually they will take the BBC1 feed on important occasions like this. One of the interesting elements here is going to be the timeshift. Since 1987, I have always been an all-nighter when it comes to General Elections, but here in North Carolina, I should be tuning in for David Dimbleby at around 5pm instead of 10. In fact by 10pm here, we should have a good idea already about how things are shaping up.
There is one uncertainty at the moment and that is whether any of the American channels will take the leader debates, happening this year for the third time. I've taken a look at the BBC America schedule for the first, next Thursday, but there is no sign of it there. The best bet might be C-SPAN, which takes Prime Ministers' Questions live every Wednesday morning at 7am our time. And this week, after the last of the PMQs for this parliament, they broadcast the previous evening's election special edition of Newsnight. In fact, C-SPAN might be a good bet for live election coverage on May 6th too.
More notes and comments here when I have more. And if you know more, please feel free to comment.
Sunday, 7 February 2010
I have often wondered about my fellow Brits' tendency to call Barack Obama "Barruck" with the stress on the first syllable when the correct pronunciation seems to be something like "BurrOCK" with the stress on the second syllable. Over on Separated by a Common Language, Lynne Murphy has a characteristically excellent post on the topic, including a nice quotation from Mock the Week about "Barrack Obama". One thing that Lynne does not mention is that the British pronunciation enables Vic and Bob to do their little Barack Obama ditties: